Enabling people to advocate for their rights.
Being able to raise concerns to facility management or to Gap Inc. is essential for workers to have a voice in their workplace. We require facilities to provide a confidential and anonymous channel for workers to express grievances without fear of retaliation. The grievance process must allow for a timely response, with documentation, and an action plan to address the issue. Our field team trains factory workers and managers on establishing and using grievance mechanisms. If our team identifies any issues, we require facilities to implement corrective action plans and evaluate their performance.
We provide all of our suppliers with information on how to effectively operate and manage grievance mechanisms. Key elements include information on:
We have a zero-tolerance policy for retaliation against workers or other stakeholders for raising concerns, whether about labor or human rights, working conditions, or any other issue. This includes a prohibition on any kind of threats or actions, including any form of economic retaliation, legal action, physical or other forms of violence, or actions that could negatively impact a complainant’s livelihood or reputation. We expect suppliers to take the same approach to non-retaliation.
Workers are free to choose the appropriate grievance mechanisms, whether through a workplace, judicial, or non-judicial mechanism. If a valid complaint involves Gap Inc., we commit to engaging in the process and attempting to resolve underlying issues. If an individual approaches Gap Inc., we do not require them to permanently waive their legal rights to other judicial or non-judicial processes as a condition to participating in the grievance process and do not require confidentiality provisions with respect to human rights grievances.
We also have developed a comprehensive suite of programs that provide myriad workplace benefits and channels where workers can effectively raise grievances. Within each program, workers are given a voice to raise concerns with facility management and outside parties, via various channels:
Each grievance channel is evaluated for its effectiveness differently, depending on which organization manages it. In every instance, Gap Inc. expects our suppliers and third parties providing grievance mechanisms for stakeholders potentially affected by our operations to consult potential or actual users of these channels on design, implementation, or performance of their channel/mechanism.
We believe that context-specific approaches to grievance mechanisms will increase the likelihood that workers use them. Additionally, we are responsive to third parties that raise grievances with us via any of our communication channels.